On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 12:28 -0400, drew wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 15:47 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > > Hi :) > > > > Ok, as i keep saying it's fine to list BSD along with the other platforms > > without giving any further details nor instructions nor a section about > > BSD. > > Just including it in the lists is plenty. > > Ah - well, it seems to me, actually, that there is a demonstrable > difference between platforms which TDF distributes binary builds for and > those for which it does not. > > But I am really, really interested in working on this more specific > piece, in addition to the generic piece, on additional platforms and > third party support. > > - There has been a bit of conversation on the subject lately and it > makes sense to work, together as a group, on something that addresses > this IMO.. > > So, I'll kind of head down that path and hope folks take an interest and > help..but not super fast, time to turn back to the disc for now.. > > BTW - I was thinking this subject might need more space so took one more > pass on the base file for extra space - here my working file for today > (won't touch this piece again today..or even the weekend.) >
Hi, Alright, I really thought this was a subject worth a flyer (brochure) so took another pass and this time pushed it to the wiki, not close to done - NEED lots of feedback form everyone..I think it should make sense as to what the subject is.. I've added the text, mostly unchanged, from Italo's blog post on the timed release model - BTW. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO-Pamphlet-platforms-support.pdf or for the ODF file... http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO-Pamphlet-platforms-support.odt Thanks Drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
