Hi :) I think that practicality demands we give people the Pdf versions so that we know how it will look after thy print it. Many places give 2 formats. 1 editable as well as the fixed Pdf.
Most claim the editable one is "Word" format. as though there was only 1 of those and that it was the same in every version of Word and that only Word could read it (surely this last point should raise alarm bells, right?). Very few separate the format from the programs. When they do they often make mistakes; claiming an xml is xls (not even ooxml, just straight xml) or claiming it's a Doc when really a DocX. On our Documentation page we get it right and state "ODT or PDF" to make it clear people have a choice which they download and then have a choice again about what program they use to open it. BTW Pdf is often listed as Adobe ... Sometimes they give a button advertising Adobe and making it easy to download Adobe Reader. We could do the same. So, on our documentation page people can choose the one that looks the same on every printer or the one that may look a little different. It's interesting no-one points out we could use a hybrid that opens as editable in LibreOffice but that Pdf readers see as straight Pdfs. It's good but a lot heavier. So it's better for directly sharing files, or over a network but not always quite so good for email or putting on websites. Anyway i think we should actively promote ODF but that we should provide marketing materials in PDF (or in both) Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: Marc Paré <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2013, 6:38 >Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Brochure-type: General Information > > >It's OK, I don't think we will ever see eye to eye on this one and it >has been done over quite often. In fact, we had the same discussion 2 >years ago. We can muse over it some other time. > >Cheers, > >Marc > >Le 14/05/13 08:06 PM, Jean Weber a écrit : >> This topic should probably have a thread of its own. --Jean >> >> On 15/05/2013, at 10:05, Jean Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 15/05/2013, at 7:54, Marc Paré <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> As a point of discussion on the printing of .pdf's from .odt: >>>> >>>> I was hoping to promote our .odt file format and hope that the people who >>>> download and print brochures would decide on their own to create the .pdf >>>> brochure should they see a need for doing so. This way, we would be >>>> assured that the person(s) would at least be using an ODF-compatible >>>> wordprocessor. >>>> >>>> This is more of a philosophical view of posting our materials and less of >>>> practicality. Does it make it more difficult to print out our brochures? >>>> Well yes, if you consider that some may just download the .pdf version and >>>> go to print with Adobe Reader or another .pdf reader, and, not even bother >>>> having a version of LibreOffice on their system. But IMO, I would then >>>> rather see people use LibreOffice or another .odt compatible wordprocessor >>>> do the work. This will at least ensure that our product and format stand >>>> out as a good solid and professional working format from which to work. It >>>> would help in establishing the ODF standard as a gold standard in office >>>> formats. >>>> >>>> We need to start displacing the .pdf format and we, the juggernaut that we >>>> are, are well placed to do this; there are really only 2 elephants in the >>>> room left and its LibreOffice and MSO. >>>> >>>> We can't keep saying that the ODF standard is the best of office suite >>>> standards and then make use of the Adobe .pdf file to print our products. >>>> We are well placed to encourage/influence more printing houses to host >>>> LibreOffice solutions on their premises for printing purposes. The first >>>> question users should say to their printing houses is "Do you >>>> service/support LibreOffice ODF printing?" If the demand is there, the >>>> service will follow. By continuing to make use of .pdf formats, we are >>>> diminishing the demand of service for our own product. >>>> >>>> We use LibreOffice in-house for our production work and we know it's >>>> strength as a serious work tool. >>>> >>>> IMO, we should start making our influence felt where we can. This will >>>> also strengthen our product with groups who are considering adoption of >>>> our suite as they will see our resolve to make the ODF formats more of the >>>> office format standard of choice. >>>> >>>> Marc >>> >>> Two points: >>> >>> I travel with an iPad. I can download and print a PDF using the iPad. I >>> cannot (yet) run LO on my iPad. When LO is available on Android, that will >>> help other tablet users -- but not us iPad users. I don't think we should >>> let ideology get in the way of practicality. >>> >>> Also, I am of the camp that says, don't give people an editable file (from >>> any office suite or DTP program) unless you want them to be able to edit >>> it. I would *never* give an editable file to a printer, if I can possibly >>> avoid it, lest they accidentally change something. >>> >>> --Jean >> > > >-- >Marc Paré >[email protected] >http://www.parEntreprise.com >parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) >parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org > > >-- >To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] >Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
