On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 03:18 +0300, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Quim Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > > - We have drafted a plan (in a piece of paper) for plenary and > > pre-scheduled sessions. It will be soon at > > http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Program > > for review and proposals. > > > I don't remember seeing public list communications about this, have I > missed it? (I was wondering why the session subject thread was so > quite) ;)
Quim and I decided to approach the program problem while being both here in San Francisco. So there wasn't even private e-mail communication for this. As already mentioned, this is meant for review and not yet final. > Where do we fit in BoF's so far? or is this TBD ? (thinking where/when > to ask for a slot for my in-progress thing- last year's session was > immensely useful, I expect if I have one this year to be the same) TBD = to be [done, decided, discussed] - take your pick ;-) We need to decide on specific time slots here, otherwise it wouldn't quite be pre-scheduled. > In scheduled sessions, I think a scheduled doc session (given thread > [0]), is in place. Or perhaps it could be better served by a plenary > session due to its importance in 5.0? A plenary session about documentation? I would rather think that documentation (just as "what do we do for Qt 5, what do we do for Qt 5") is an aspect that should be discussed in every of the listed essential and add-on sessions. If there is an over-arching issue that needs to be addressed, it could fit into the "state of the union" session. regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
