Bob thinks that the AIUF is not Trotskyist and is utopian. Well 
that's a very revealing admission to come from someone who thinks 
that the ICL is the best Trotskyist group around in a period of 
reaction when imperialism is fuelling national differences as its 
chosen means of repartitioning the former post-capitalist bloc.

Yugoslavia is an oppressed country right? It is being occupied by 
imperialism right?  How do communists defend an oppressed country 
against imperialism?  Unconditional military defence.  
Unconditional means that even if the national bourgeoisie is a 
dictatorship attacking the workers, workers bloc militarily with 
the dictatorship against imperialism. Why? Because imperialism is the 
worst enemy and is responsible for creating the conditions of the 
dicatatorship if not installing the dictatorship itself. Trotsky 
first made this clear in the war between Ethiopia and Italy when 
Ethiopia was ruled by a dictator.

So this military  bloc is with an alien class,  the national 
bourgeoisie, so the working class must maitain its armed 
independence from the national bourgeoisie. Why? Because the 
national bourgeoisie is a class which has a much closer interest in 
supporting imperialism than defending its own working class. The 
only reason that it is defending itself from imperialism is to 
improve the terms on which it acts as imperialisms agent in 
oppressing colonial or semi-colonial workers.  Sooner or later it 
will turn on those same workers when their power threatens not only 
to defeat imperialism but to kick out their local agents. 

This  was the tragic lesson that came out of the Stalinist bloc of 4 
classes in China in the 1920's where the workers subordinated their 
military forces to the national bourgeoisie which turned on the 
workers and massacred them. 

So the AIUF requires the  MILITARY independence of the workers 
forces in a bloc with the national bourgeoisie. There is no question 
of any POLITICAL dependence on the bourgeoisie. That the AIUF 
must mean  a political bloc with the national bourgeosis is the 
classic sectarian line of the ICL which sees Trotsky's AIUF as a form 
of popular front, because as sectarians they are frightened that 
a militiary bloc with the bourgesoisie might lead to a political 
bloc. 

This sectarian position applied to Yugoslavia today is to call for 
the abstract defence of Yugoslavia without specifying how workers can 
do this if they are divided by national differences,  and then to 
disguise this abstention by calling for a  Federation of Socialist 
Republics.  But before such a federation can be built, first it is 
necessary to build multi-ethnic militias and councils. This cannot 
be done if the real ethnic oppression unleashed by a history of 
imperialist conquest is ignored. This is sectarian because it fails 
to answer the immediately perceived cause of oppression with a 
practical demonstration of the real cause of oppression. This is why 
I said that the sectasriahs are put to shame by the militant ethnic 
Albanian nationalist who calls for multiethnic opposition to NATO! 
The only way to acheive this is to do it on the ground in the form of 
multi-ethnic militias which defend the right of each ethnic group to 
defend their rights and prove that NATO and its bourgeois stooges 
on all sides are the enemy. 

So it is an ongoing necessity to unite workers across ethnic 
differences, against all the imperialist re-fuelling of these 
divisions behind the regimes of  ex-stalinist or fascist warlords and 
bourgeois elements. It was necessary during the Bosnia war and 
remains necessary in Kovoso and in the future developments as the 
Balkans is Balkanised further by the various imperialist powers. The 
imperialist counter-revolution has already broken up and partitioned 
most of Yugoslavia. The defeat in Bosnia is much worse than that in 
Kosovo because it set the precedent for Kosovo. It created a U/German 
dominated statelet which maintains the fiction of independence by 
having its own mark pegged to the German mark. What is happening in 
Kosovo is the final stages of the break-up which will see Kosovo 
becoming part of Albania, after a decent UN burial of NATO's 
casualties, Montenegro split away, and the ethnic Albanians in 
Kosovo, Montnegro and Macedonia fuse into a US protectorate of 
Albania. 

All of this proves that imperialism is repartitioning the former 
post-capitalist  Soviet-bloc by refuelling old ethnic divisions so 
that it can use the pretext of ethnic cleansing to intervene with its 
now tooled up NATO/UNO machine.  In the current situation then 
communists will need to get their understanding of the national 
question as a class question very clear so as to be able to do more 
than posture in defence of oppressed countries.  One of the things 
that Bob and his ICL (if they have not done so) will need to realise, 
is that in the next round , Russia as a semi-colony, and China as a 
degenerate workers state moving towards restoration, are the next in 
the Wests's sights. 





     --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Reply via email to