It would have been a better essay without the Wittgensteinianism. And Rosa continues to show what a jackass he--excuse me, she--is.
The historical turn of the '60s and after went in a number of directions: that is a phenomenon worth analyzing. For example, there is conceptual material galore in Jerome Ravetz' key work of 1971; decades later he ends up partnering with an Islamist obscurantist. Is decadence necessary, or is it contingent? On 12/23/2010 6:57 AM, Jim Farmelant wrote: > > > Rosa Litchenstein has now published on her site the last of > the Marxist philosopher Guy Robinson's essays: > http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Robinson_Essay_Four_On_Misunderstanding_Science.htm > It's all about Thomas Kuhn. > > _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
