On Fri, Feb 5, 2021, at 08:56, Michael Meeropol wrote:
> view of the slave power as retarding the development of American capitalism 
> and their strong belief that the victory of the North would be a progressive 
> step forward (in keeping with Marx's view that capitalism had an "historic 
> mission") ....

Why is that a contradiction? Can it not both be capitalist and slow the growth 
of other capitalist industry?

Were the goods produced not sold on the same international market and 
production funded by the same financial markets as any other capitalist 
industry at the time? How they could not be capitalist is beyond me.

Tristan


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#6130): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/6130
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/80286261/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to