[Edited Message Follows]

mkaradjis said

> 
> Marxists need to get their bizarre rose-coloured glasses when it comes to
> any states (imperial or otherwise) that are not part of the US-led
> alliance, and just see things for what they are. The Uhygur are oppressed
> by the Han-chauvinist Dengist regime.
> 

and

> 
> But when a Marxist living in the West decides that some struggle is the
> standard  by which all others must be measured against - a common view in
> relation to Palestine (no doubt caused by the extreme bias in all western
> governments and media regarding the Zionist state's blatant racsm,
> illegality and war crimes) - then you need to question yourself about why
> you are supporting that particular struggle in the first place, if your
> reason for doing so is *not* opposition to all oppression.

You have to understand a few things here.

The tendency among many on the left, is to automatically question any news that 
comes from any mainstream source, whether that source be Fox News, The New York 
Times, or MSNBC. Sources like Radio Free Asia are viewed as State Department or 
CIA propaganda. Many see them as no more trustworthy than Alex Jones. Most NGOs 
are not to be trusted either, as they have members with similar ties. Others 
like Adrian Zenz, have both far right politics, and have had the validity of 
their story brought into question.The global north is seen as imperialist, and  
untrustworthy. The US government has a history going back at least to the 
sinking of the USS Maine, of lying the country into wars, in order to conquer 
people of color. Mao, Stalin, and the DPRK are romanticized. This is the view I 
,and many other leftists, share. Much of our news about China comes from either 
Chinese state media, or media friendly to China, which is seen as more credible 
than mainstream capitalist media. I know of countless US communists and 
socialists that share this view.

Then there is the belief that the story of what is happening in Xinjiang is 
being exaggerated to maintain US and NATO hegemony. What's more, we now know 
about the lies, and foreign inflences, behind the so called "democracy 
protests" in Hong Kong a couple of years back. About the Dalai Lama, and his 
CIA connections, that came out many years later. For better or worse, 
comparisons have been made to the Uhygurs, and the Kuwati incubator baby story, 
and other such fabrications. Maybe the Uhygur situation is different. Maybe 
there is mistreatment of Uhygurs ,but it has been exaggerated. I've gone from a 
denialist to being on the fence. That is progress. There is a lot to overcome 
here.

So you might understand how someone like myself might question the stories 
coming out of Xinjiang, and might find them more believable if either a country 
like Cuba  came out in support of the Uyghurs, or if there were high ranking 
Chinese government officials, who came out as whistle blowers. No one dubts 
there is racism on the part of Han Chinese, and what I have learned about 
American capitalist support, before 2019, has opened my eyes a bit more.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7993): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/7993
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81730562/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to