Sounds like b.s. The proffered evidence is "according to a source familiar with 
the conversation" and an email by one of Fain's attorneys.

And note that none of this even attempts to refute the charges that Fain 
punished union officials who questioned Fain's demand that his fiancee get UAW 
money to which she had no entitlement.

Fain has proved himself a class collaborationist, albeit with a good act of 
appearing feisty ( 
https://newworker.us/labor/uaws-shawn-fain-feisty-collaboration-or-class-struggle-economics/
 ).


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#31108): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/31108
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/107175980/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to