On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:04:18PM -0400, Ethan Mallove wrote: >>> The attached patch gets it passed the "?:" issues. (I didn't have a >>> real SVN checkout, so I don't know if my "makeshift" diff will work.) >> >> It was reversed, but applied fine. In SVN, > > Attached is another (possibly Sun Studio specific) patch. > Sun Studio complains about missing symbols if a few of these > "inline" functions are not "static inline". E.g.,
Looks like some of these are already "static inline". Do svn update.
GI
PS: Your patch failed. Perhaps a "diff -u" will do better. Though the
best is to check it out from subversion and svn diff.
--
'Common' Proof Techniques:
7. Proof by deferral -- "We'll prove this later in the course".
pgpiH2vkOhP1W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________ Materm-devel mailing list Materm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net
