On Tue, Jun/10/2008 07:21:52PM, Gautam Iyer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:04:18PM -0400, Ethan Mallove wrote: > > >>> The attached patch gets it passed the "?:" issues. (I didn't have a > >>> real SVN checkout, so I don't know if my "makeshift" diff will work.) > >> > >> It was reversed, but applied fine. In SVN, > > > > Attached is another (possibly Sun Studio specific) patch. > > Sun Studio complains about missing symbols if a few of these > > "inline" functions are not "static inline". E.g., > > Looks like some of these are already "static inline". Do svn update. > > GI > > PS: Your patch failed. Perhaps a "diff -u" will do better. Though the > best is to check it out from subversion and svn diff.
Can I get a stable release through SVN? What's the revision number for 0.5.2? -Ethan > > -- > 'Common' Proof Techniques: > 7. Proof by deferral -- "We'll prove this later in the course". > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Materm-devel mailing list > Materm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel > mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Materm-devel mailing list Materm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net
