On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:39 PM, John Hunter <jdh2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Root <ben.r...@ou.edu> wrote:
> > I am currently working to patch something in colors.py and I am coming
> > across a lot of older style code and code that duplicates functionality
> that
> > can be found in cbook.py (particularly the type-checking functions).  Is
> > there a standing rule that code that we come across should get updated or
> > adapted to use the functions in cbook.py?
> >
> > Or is it the other way around and that we should be avoiding cbook.py?
>
> You should be using as much centralized functionality (eg cbook) as
> possible and clean-ups are welcome.  Just make sure if you remove a
> func that may be outward facing (eg a duplicate function from
> colors.py) that you deprecate it with a warning and note it in the
> log, and that the regression tests are passing.
>
> Thanks for the efforts!
> JDH
>

Ok, good to know.

Btw, the current set of tests has a failure for testing pcolormesh.  Wasn't
there a change fairly recently to fix a problem with pcolormesh, so that the
test image should now be updated?

Ben Root
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to