On 08/13/2010 06:20 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Eric Firing <efir...@hawaii.edu
> <mailto:efir...@hawaii.edu>> wrote:
>
>     On 08/12/2010 09:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>      > Btw, the current set of tests has a failure for testing pcolormesh.
>      > Wasn't there a change fairly recently to fix a problem with
>     pcolormesh,
>      > so that the test image should now be updated?
>
>     Mike did update the images a couple weeks ago, and when I run the tests,
>     I don't get that failure.  Is it possible that you have not done a clean
>     rebuild and install since Mike's changes?
>
>     Eric
>
>
> Visually, I can't see the difference between the expected and the
> generated images, but the test system is reporting a RMS of 116.512.  I
> have tried completely clean installs of the trunk version of
> matplotlib.  The same happens for completely clean installs of the
> maintenance branch as well.

This may be a limitation of the test system, then.  I think that 
differences in external libraries can cause subtle output differences, 
triggering a false failure alarm.  Maybe the tolerance needs to be 
increased for this particular test.

Eric

>
> Ben Root


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to