On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Eric Firing <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/13/2010 06:20 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Eric Firing <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 08/12/2010 09:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > > Btw, the current set of tests has a failure for testing > pcolormesh. > > > Wasn't there a change fairly recently to fix a problem with > > pcolormesh, > > > so that the test image should now be updated? > > > > Mike did update the images a couple weeks ago, and when I run the > tests, > > I don't get that failure. Is it possible that you have not done a > clean > > rebuild and install since Mike's changes? > > > > Eric > > > > > > Visually, I can't see the difference between the expected and the > > generated images, but the test system is reporting a RMS of 116.512. I > > have tried completely clean installs of the trunk version of > > matplotlib. The same happens for completely clean installs of the > > maintenance branch as well. > > This may be a limitation of the test system, then. I think that > differences in external libraries can cause subtle output differences, > triggering a false failure alarm. Maybe the tolerance needs to be > increased for this particular test. > > Eric > > Or maybe there is a bug in how it is calculating the differences? I am flipping back and forth between the images in eog and I can't figure out what is different. Ben Root
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
