Hi, I missed this discussion somehow. I model FACTS devices using MatPower too and will gladly upload it when the thing is finished. The method is very similar to the taps and phase analysis that I githubbed earlier.
Please give a heads up which way your intended FACTS modelling is headed. I would have to see which way MatPower's FACTS modelling will go, because I don't think it's good to mix very differrent types of methods since convergence characteristics will usually tend to get muddy. Regards, Gorazd ________________________________ Od: [email protected] [[email protected]] v imenu Ray Zimmerman [[email protected]] Poslano: 27. september 2017 21:06 Za: MATPOWER discussion forum Zadeva: Re: FACTS INCLUSION Let’s coordinate off-line initially, and then, on MATPOWER-DEV-L when it makes sense. Ray On Sep 27, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thank you Ray for the reply, I wish to coordinate with you on this front. How to I get involved and when likely are we going to start. I was the one who contributed the voltage and branch limits enforcement in CPF termination. Regards. Ahmad. On Sep 27, 2017 7:33 PM, "Ray Zimmerman" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I am not aware of anything specific being worked on at the moment related to FACTS devices. However, over the next year, I plan to do some refactoring of some of the core of MATPOWER to generalize things in a way that should make modeling FACTS devices much easier. So, anyone seriously planning to work on this area may want to coordinate with me. Ray > On Sep 27, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > Is there any development or progress on FACTS models inclusion in MATPOWER? > > Or rather what is the progress so far? Can I be involved in it? > > In anticipation of your responses.
