Hi. 1. I think power injection model are probably a good way to go. Sadly, I don't know what is possible with MatPower's CDF capability. 2. Of course. I will be answering any questions on the mailing list if my time and knowledge permit.
regards, Gorazd ________________________________ Od: [email protected] [[email protected]] v imenu Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar [[email protected]] Poslano: 28. september 2017 14:26 Za: MATPOWER discussion forum Zadeva: RE: FACTS INCLUSION Dear Gorazd, I am looking at power injection models of TCSC, SSSC and UPFC in MATPOWER, these however has to do with my work. I will appreciate your view on the following questions. 1) Run CPF with FACTS, is this visible for load ability increment? 2) May I request that I reach out to you for clarifications as the need arises In anticipation of your response. Regards Ahmad On Sep 28, 2017 8:27 AM, "Bone, Gorazd" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I missed this discussion somehow. I model FACTS devices using MatPower too and will gladly upload it when the thing is finished. The method is very similar to the taps and phase analysis that I githubbed earlier. Please give a heads up which way your intended FACTS modelling is headed. I would have to see which way MatPower's FACTS modelling will go, because I don't think it's good to mix very differrent types of methods since convergence characteristics will usually tend to get muddy. Regards, Gorazd ________________________________ Od: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] v imenu Ray Zimmerman [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Poslano: 27. september 2017 21:06 Za: MATPOWER discussion forum Zadeva: Re: FACTS INCLUSION Let’s coordinate off-line initially, and then, on MATPOWER-DEV-L when it makes sense. Ray On Sep 27, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thank you Ray for the reply, I wish to coordinate with you on this front. How to I get involved and when likely are we going to start. I was the one who contributed the voltage and branch limits enforcement in CPF termination. Regards. Ahmad. On Sep 27, 2017 7:33 PM, "Ray Zimmerman" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I am not aware of anything specific being worked on at the moment related to FACTS devices. However, over the next year, I plan to do some refactoring of some of the core of MATPOWER to generalize things in a way that should make modeling FACTS devices much easier. So, anyone seriously planning to work on this area may want to coordinate with me. Ray > On Sep 27, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > Is there any development or progress on FACTS models inclusion in MATPOWER? > > Or rather what is the progress so far? Can I be involved in it? > > In anticipation of your responses.
