Does anyone from the matterhorn-users list think a separate, monthly adoption meeting would be useful?

On 8/8/11 2:03 PM, Rubén Pérez wrote:
Resending this to the matterhorn mail list as well. Sorry for the noise.

El 8 de agosto de 2011 23:00, Rubén Pérez <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:

    +1 , and +1 to Chris opinion of leaving them for developers only,
    because:

    a) If a lot of dev. related topics are discussed, adopters
    (meaning: "adopters not interesting in development aspects") will
    get bored and probably never come back
    b) If we focus on adopters first, and it happens that the
    discussion goes on for a considerable amount of time, then we will
    have less time/be more tired for focusing on development
    discussion afterwards

    In short, developers and adopters main interests may match
    sometimes, but most of the time are completely different.

    This is just an opinion, though. I'll stick to what the majority
    decides.

    Regards,
    Rubén


    2011/8/8 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>

        +1 from me as well.

        On 08.08.2011, at 21:47, Adam Hochman wrote:

        > Hi all,
        > It's apparent that we don't need to meet Tuesdays and
        Thursdays any more, nevertheless, I'd like to reinvigorate our
        weekly meetings by limiting them to Tuesdays.   I think the
        lack of attendance has been partially due to everyone's summer
        schedules, but we need to get back on track.  There are a lot
        of plans for Matterhorn in the upcoming year and its critical
        that we build in some F2F time.  I would also like to suggest
        we move the Tuesday meeting from 7:30 am to 8:00 am PST.
        >
        > I also suggest that we open the meetings up to adopters as
        well.  We can dedicate a small portion of our time to Adopter
        Q&A for anyone from matterhorn-users or the community at
        large.  I would be happy to call out for agenda items on a
        weekly basis.
        >
        > As always, proposals have a 72 hour incubation period.  If
        no one disagrees, this proposal will be put into practice via
        lazy consensus.
        >
        > Best,
        > Adam
        >
        > Matterhorn Community Liaison
        > UC Berkeley
        > _______________________________________________
        > Matterhorn mailing list
        > [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
        >
        >
        > To unsubscribe please email
        > [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        > _______________________________________________

        _______________________________________________
        Matterhorn-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users




_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

Reply via email to