I believe there is great value in a monthly meeting with participation from adopters encouraged.
[email protected] wrote on 08/08/2011 04:22:53 PM: > > Does anyone from the matterhorn-users list think a separate, monthly > adoption meeting would be useful? > > On 8/8/11 2:03 PM, Rubén Pérez wrote: > Resending this to the matterhorn mail list as well. Sorry for the noise. > El 8 de agosto de 2011 23:00, Rubén Pérez <[email protected]> escribió: > +1 , and +1 to Chris opinion of leaving them for developers only, because: > > a) If a lot of dev. related topics are discussed, adopters (meaning: > "adopters not interesting in development aspects") will get bored > and probably never come back > b) If we focus on adopters first, and it happens that the discussion > goes on for a considerable amount of time, then we will have less > time/be more tired for focusing on development discussion afterwards > > In short, developers and adopters main interests may match > sometimes, but most of the time are completely different. > > This is just an opinion, though. I'll stick to what the majority decides. > > Regards, > Rubén > > 2011/8/8 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]> > +1 from me as well. > > On 08.08.2011, at 21:47, Adam Hochman wrote: > > > Hi all, > > It's apparent that we don't need to meet Tuesdays and Thursdays > any more, nevertheless, I'd like to reinvigorate our weekly meetings > by limiting them to Tuesdays. I think the lack of attendance has > been partially due to everyone's summer schedules, but we need to > get back on track. There are a lot of plans for Matterhorn in the > upcoming year and its critical that we build in some F2F time. I > would also like to suggest we move the Tuesday meeting from 7:30 am > to 8:00 am PST. > > > > I also suggest that we open the meetings up to adopters as well. > We can dedicate a small portion of our time to Adopter Q&A for > anyone from matterhorn-users or the community at large. I would be > happy to call out for agenda items on a weekly basis. > > > > As always, proposals have a 72 hour incubation period. If no one > disagrees, this proposal will be put into practice via lazy consensus. > > > > Best, > > Adam > > > > Matterhorn Community Liaison > > UC Berkeley > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
