+1 for the meeting once a week.
+1 for allowing adopters in this meeting. I guess it would be good for
the developers to get some frequent feedback from the users.
Rüdiger
Am 08.08.2011 23:22, schrieb Adam Hochman:
Does anyone from the matterhorn-users list think a separate, monthly
adoption meeting would be useful?
On 8/8/11 2:03 PM, Rubén Pérez wrote:
Resending this to the matterhorn mail list as well. Sorry for the noise.
El 8 de agosto de 2011 23:00, Rubén Pérez <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:
+1 , and +1 to Chris opinion of leaving them for developers only,
because:
a) If a lot of dev. related topics are discussed, adopters
(meaning: "adopters not interesting in development aspects") will
get bored and probably never come back
b) If we focus on adopters first, and it happens that the
discussion goes on for a considerable amount of time, then we
will have less time/be more tired for focusing on development
discussion afterwards
In short, developers and adopters main interests may match
sometimes, but most of the time are completely different.
This is just an opinion, though. I'll stick to what the majority
decides.
Regards,
Rubén
2011/8/8 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
+1 from me as well.
On 08.08.2011, at 21:47, Adam Hochman wrote:
> Hi all,
> It's apparent that we don't need to meet Tuesdays and
Thursdays any more, nevertheless, I'd like to reinvigorate
our weekly meetings by limiting them to Tuesdays. I think
the lack of attendance has been partially due to everyone's
summer schedules, but we need to get back on track. There
are a lot of plans for Matterhorn in the upcoming year and
its critical that we build in some F2F time. I would also
like to suggest we move the Tuesday meeting from 7:30 am to
8:00 am PST.
>
> I also suggest that we open the meetings up to adopters as
well. We can dedicate a small portion of our time to Adopter
Q&A for anyone from matterhorn-users or the community at
large. I would be happy to call out for agenda items on a
weekly basis.
>
> As always, proposals have a 72 hour incubation period. If
no one disagrees, this proposal will be put into practice via
lazy consensus.
>
> Best,
> Adam
>
> Matterhorn Community Liaison
> UC Berkeley
> _______________________________________________
> Matterhorn mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
> To unsubscribe please email
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
--
________________________________________________
Rüdiger Rolf, M.A.
Universität Osnabrück - Zentrum virtUOS
Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabrück
Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
