On 11-09-07 01:57 PM, Nils Birnbaum wrote: > On 07.09.11 18:23, Christopher Brooks wrote: >> I look forward to your proposed changes. > Sorry that gives no sense to me. There are several reasons not to do > this. Beside the fact that we need a more fact based discussion on > process related topics as we have it when Matterhorn discuss development > related topics (That works in another project good for us is no > argument), in my opinion Matterhorn didn't need a proposal of a single > person like me.
As discussed previously, those who complain (or -1) need to come up with a proposal to remedy their complaints. Whether that proposal comes from a group, or an individual does not matter. > Like Rüdiger and I did it a couple of month ago we need two or three > people who take a look at different approaches, the structure of the > project, the resources and the release strategy and than make a proposal. Sounds like a plan, please keep us in the loop. I'm sure there will be others interested in commenting on your proposal as well. G > Just my two cents > > Nils > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
