=== The original message was multipart MIME ===
=== All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===
This can lead to that whole debate again about which is better, coaxial or
optical. In the past I have read quite a few comments here and else where
on the net claiming that coaxial was better.
But I have been having direct contact with electronic and computer types
that feel basically they are the same, but for limited distances optical is
better then coaxial. One argument they gave was about the phone companies
going to fiber optics.
What do you think? All I know is that I just bought a DVD player (hasn't
been delivered yet) that plays MP3s. Unfortunately it has a coaxial
output, so I guess I may be one of those people interested in such a
converter.
Thanks,
Larry
Eric Woudenberg wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> "Nathan White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >I started making Coax- Optical converters, which I plan to sell quite
> >inexpensively. I am testing the market on Ebay, with the link
> >below. If you want to mention it on your site I will build a web
> >page if there is good response. Thanks.
> >
> >
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=371670403
>
> Thanks for the note. Your converter looks very nice. I'm forwarding
> your note to the MD mailing list since I am somewhat disinclined to put
> a link to a single item at auction in the news.
>
> If you do make a page for the device however, I'd be happy to add a
> link in the news for it.
>
> Regards,
> Rick
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=== MIME part removed : text/html; ===
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
