On 11/26/2012 12:14 PM, Quim Gil wrote: > That wouldn't be the solution of the tarball problem you are describing > but it would be really useful for the majority of MW admins having to > search for extensions *after* they miss something.
Actually, any extensions that are widely used like that *should* be considered for inclusion in the tarball. Mark -- http://hexmode.com/ Language will always shift from day to day. It is the wind blowing through our mouths. -- http://hexm.de/np _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
