I agree with Mark. Extensions that have broad use and are useful in multiple common situations would useful to include into the next tarball release. Most of the default extensions included with the previous MediaWiki tarballs are very nice to have out of the box, and I like the idea of having all the extensions commonly used by most MW admins available in the next tarball release.
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:18:34 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MediaWiki-l] Extensions to include in the 1.21 > tarball/installer > > On 11/26/2012 12:14 PM, Quim Gil wrote: > > That wouldn't be the solution of the tarball problem you are describing > > but it would be really useful for the majority of MW admins having to > > search for extensions *after* they miss something. > > Actually, any extensions that are widely used like that *should* be > considered for inclusion in the tarball. > > Mark > > -- > http://hexmode.com/ > > Language will always shift from day to day. It is the wind blowing > through our mouths. -- http://hexm.de/np > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
