On 26 November 2012 17:18, Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/26/2012 12:14 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
>> That wouldn't be the solution of the tarball problem you are describing >> but it would be really useful for the majority of MW admins having to >> search for extensions *after* they miss something. > Actually, any extensions that are widely used like that *should* be > considered for inclusion in the tarball. Something analogous to popcon for extensions? - d. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
