Another place to look for lists of the type Quim wants: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Possible_tarballs
This is in addition to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Suggestions_for_extensions_to_be_integrated . -- Sumana Harihareswara Engineering Community Manager Wikimedia Foundation On 11/26/2012 12:49 PM, Arcane 21 wrote: > > I agree with Mark. Extensions that have broad use and are useful in multiple > common situations would useful to include into the next tarball release. Most > of the default extensions included with the previous MediaWiki tarballs are > very nice to have out of the box, and I like the idea of having all the > extensions commonly used by most MW admins available in the next tarball > release. > >> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:18:34 -0500 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [MediaWiki-l] Extensions to include in the 1.21 >> tarball/installer >> >> On 11/26/2012 12:14 PM, Quim Gil wrote: >>> That wouldn't be the solution of the tarball problem you are describing >>> but it would be really useful for the majority of MW admins having to >>> search for extensions *after* they miss something. >> >> Actually, any extensions that are widely used like that *should* be >> considered for inclusion in the tarball. >> >> Mark >> >> -- >> http://hexmode.com/ >> >> Language will always shift from day to day. It is the wind blowing >> through our mouths. -- http://hexm.de/np >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MediaWiki-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
