On 30 Mar 2010, at 12:19, Glen Gray wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2010, at 12:10, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Intel's bootchart is very
>> small, pure C, has no dependencies etc. There are plenty of
>> semi-technical arguments you can make in it's favour.
>
> Such as the interpreter taking longer to start than the OS
>
> "(clear example: we used to have a bootchart rendered in java in moblin: just
> enabling the render program at boot would suck in the entire java engine into
> the IO load at boot time - costing us seconds of boot time and lots of
> memory. We then found a python implementation, but that one turned out to
> have pretty much the same cost w/r memory and IO footprint. Now we have a
> C-implementation I ended up writing, which is incredibly cheap compared to
> the other two alternatives)."
> - http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-February/000580.html
Why would the rendering be done at boot-time? Surely this would be done *after*
boot?
> Glen Gray
> <[email protected]>
Regards,
Jamie.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
