On 03/30/10 03:43, David Greaves wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
My views on this sort of Intel internal re-writing are well known.
There is a good way to do this: work with the existing guys on the
various bootchart projects out there, and try to draw them together.
That is the approach I took with bootchart2. It is also far, far less
wasteful of the scarce resources that we (collectively) have today to
work on tooling.
+1
There is a good way to do software development in community; and IMNSHO
it doesn't look like this. We don't need yet-another bootchart
project[2] there are currently a handful (now +1).
+1
Auke - I would suggest that you lead by example and make a conscious effort to
say "NIH is not acceptable. We now know of external tools that are functionally
equivalent to internal tools. We will drop the internal tool and work with the
wider community."
Nonsense :)
Innovation comes from looking at an old good idea, and making a newer
and shinier implementation of it - not from shooting down good ideas
just because someone has already invented it...
Auke
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
