Hi Ibrahim, Thanks for the info!
Ibrahim Haddad wrote: > As for the MeeGo compliance process we have a self imposed deadline of > June 25. We were delayed initially as we worked on the WG governance and > project structure. So I am hoping this time to meet the deadline. In bugzilla bug #1303, David Greaves and myself asked a question that you didn't answer at the time - is there any reason why materials are systematically being sent to Nokia and Intel for review once you have a proposal which has gone through Linux Foundation legal review? This has happened now with compliance, trademark guidelines and documentation licensing. Since MeeGo is (in theory) a Linux Foundation-shepherded community project, in which Intel and Nokia are but two participating companies (albeit the largest), wouldn't it make sense to publish drafts and have the review happen in public, rather than behind closed doors with two preferred partners? Thanks! Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
