Hi,
I totally appreciate your battle not being a stranger to them myself :*
However, are you able to guesstimate an ETA?
Best Regards
/Mats Bergström
Mats Bergström
Application System Architect
ST-Ericsson
Nya Vattentornet
SE-22183, Lund
Sweden
www.stericsson.com
Office: +46 46 104260
Mobile: +46 76 139 5856
Fax: +46 46 106274
Email: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Janne Karhunen
Sent: den 10 juni 2010 14:17
To: Greg KH
Cc: [email protected]; Elena Reshetova
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Security architecture
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
>> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>> and codebase. More details about that:
>>
>> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
>>
>> Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now.
>
> "now"? Cool, where is the code?
Hiding behind me ;). Interestingly, we have a battle going on with
our legal about it and have to change the name of the whole thing
before posting the patches. Unforeseen thing really, sorry about
that.
Me & Elena & Dmitry will be giving talks about it in OLS and in
security summit unless the travel requests bounce. If you show
up this year I guess we can have a chat about it. I will post the
initial set of patches once the name hassle is sorted (prior to
OLS anyway).
Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
multiple task labels and the fact that we don't allow the task to
change it's own security context.
--
// Janne
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
