On 10/06/2010 14:17, Janne Karhunen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model >>> and codebase. More details about that: >>> >>> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo >>> >>> Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now. >> >> "now"? Cool, where is the code? > > Hiding behind me ;). Interestingly, we have a battle going on with > our legal about it and have to change the name of the whole thing > before posting the patches. Unforeseen thing really, sorry about > that. > > Me & Elena & Dmitry will be giving talks about it in OLS and in > security summit unless the travel requests bounce. If you show > up this year I guess we can have a chat about it. I will post the > initial set of patches once the name hassle is sorted (prior to > OLS anyway).
Now that Handset UX “day 1” is out, is there any news on this? There are few commits here and there in the Meego Platform Security project in gitorious (http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-platform-security) (and a dpkg tree :) but it seems that some bits are still missing (and documentation, too :) As I understand it, Meego 1.1 “developper review” doesn't have a security architecture yet, but is it planned for 1.1 or for later (as it was intended for Harmattan and I have to admit I have no idea where Harmattan currently sits, between Fremantle and Meego 1.1)? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
