On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:04 +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 13:18, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can imagine that there's a need to get such open enhancements out of > > the various queues. What has worked for SyncEvolution is to change "NEW" > > into "ASSIGNED" (to get it out of list of issues which need to be > > triaged) and pick a dummy user as assignee (to avoid cluttering personal > > issue lists). > > A relatively good solution, although assigned to a dummy user is a bit > of a bodge. Isn't there "ACCEPTED"?
No. > ACCEPTED, unassigned and low > priority would give a list of things which people could attempt if > they had free time. If there was a "complexity" field (set by the > component owner), low priority, low complexity, ACCPETED issues could > give an easy way in to new developers to many many parts of the > project. I agree, for searching for any kind of pending, unassigned feature request that would be better. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
