On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 13:04 +0100, Robin Burchell wrote: > Excerpts from Andrew Flegg's message of Mon Jul 12 12:55:24 +0100 2010: > > Perhaps a new resolution of "NOTAPRIORITY" (or things are kept open at > > a low priority) needs to exist? > > I would personally much prefer things just stay open, especially if they're > enhancement requests.
I agree. I can imagine that there's a need to get such open enhancements out of the various queues. What has worked for SyncEvolution is to change "NEW" into "ASSIGNED" (to get it out of list of issues which need to be triaged) and pick a dummy user as assignee (to avoid cluttering personal issue lists). -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
