On 08/04/2010 02:32 PM, ext Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 8/4/2010 4:29 AM, Ameya Palande wrote:
Skipping review check for what goes inside config-generic is not
acceptable since it is also used by ARM.
nobody is hiding what goes into config-generic, and additions get put at
the end...
so why don't you do your review based on what is there, rather than
blocking progress instead?
and yes if you add a patch to the arm section of the kernel that adds a
config option, I expect you to update config-generic as well.
I know you've not done that consistently so far, and so far I've usually
fixed up after you....
Before the flame war begins, I'd rather advocate that config-generic is
kept as small as possible and then platform-specific configs are handled
separately.
Clearly the current process is not making people happy.
igor
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
