On 8/4/2010 5:11 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:32 PM, ext Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 8/4/2010 4:29 AM, Ameya Palande wrote:
Skipping review check for what goes inside config-generic is not
acceptable since it is also used by ARM.
nobody is hiding what goes into config-generic, and additions get put at
the end...
so why don't you do your review based on what is there, rather than
blocking progress instead?
and yes if you add a patch to the arm section of the kernel that adds a
config option, I expect you to update config-generic as well.
I know you've not done that consistently so far, and so far I've usually
fixed up after you....
Before the flame war begins, I'd rather advocate that config-generic
is kept as small as possible and then platform-specific configs are
handled separately.
I think that misses the point.
(and yes I know Amaya is not happy)
config-generic is the set of defaults
the platform specific configs are overrides to these defaults, so that
the platform specific configs don't HAVE to deal with every config option.
they can if they want to... that's why it's an override.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
