On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Christian Daudt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote: > >> Please visit: > >> > http://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/linux-foundation-trademark-usage-guidelines(which<http://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/linux-foundation-trademark-usage-guidelines%28which> > >> also includes correct and incorrect ways of using the mark) > >> > >> The link above is also reachable from: http://meego.com/about/trademark > > > > Yes, but again, those pages say: > > Trademark Usage > > > > MeeGo™ is a trademark of the Linux Foundation. MeeGo may be used > > in accordance with the Linux Foundation Trademark Policy in > > association with a product that has fulfilled all requirements > > of the MeeGo Compliance Program for that product and for the > > specific version and release of MeeGo that is indicated. > > > > And the link to the "MeeGo Compliance Program" say: > > Compliance Program > > > > We are still in the process of finalizing our Compliance > > Program, but will update this page with the details soon. > > > > So, we are back at square one. > > > > So, I guess we can stick with this then: > > > > Smeegol, based on the netbook user interface that came from the > > Meego(TM)* project. > > > > * Meego is a trademark of the Linux Foundation. > > > > Right? > > How is the UX going to be used without the components? I.e if the > Meego apps/config/tools/etc... all rely on things like connman, what > does Andrew mean when he says he is getting the "Meego UX to run on > openSUSE without the meego stack" ? Does that mean all of the Meego > applications ported to use SuSE stack, or does that mean just the > Meego look-and-feel on the SuSE applications? People don't say they > are using the KDE desktop without the KDE components, or running > openSUSE without the openSUSE stack... How does that make sense in > Meego? > > thanks, > csd > > > I think to draw a parallel would be to say that compliance will be granted based on usage of compliance with MeeGo Core and Profile (UX). This is also independent for the concept of compliant applications - in which context, an application is compliance when it is not dependent on libraries / packages outside of the MeeGo set (or that any additional libraries / packages are provided with the application - which seem to be as well an ongoing discussion topic on the mailing list) I think this discussion is really a continuation of the ongoing thread on MeeGo compliance. > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > _______________________________________________ > > MeeGo-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
