On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/20/2010 4:47 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> >> On M >>>> >>>> Great, as there is no final compliance program, all things are free to >>>> use, right? >>> >>> Depending on what is being used, some require proper attribution. >> >> How can an artwork package require "attribution"? Why wouldn't it >> already be contained in the metadata in the package in the first place? > > my understanding is that some of the artwork as shipped is licensed only for > compliant OSes (technically, OSes that also have a trademark license), this > is similar to > how others protect their logos etc... it's the "identity" that's associated > with the trademark/etc. >
I can confirm that we follow this with the MeeGo logo, meaning only compliance OSes can use MeeGo logo as part of their collateral and so on. Unfortunately I don't have visibility into the art work. I will send some emails to figure out that part. Ibrahim > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
