On 9/20/2010 5:10 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:57:51PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 9/20/2010 4:47 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On M
Great, as there is no final compliance program, all things are free to
use, right?
Depending on what is being used, some require proper attribution.
How can an artwork package require "attribution"? Why wouldn't it
already be contained in the metadata in the package in the first place?
my understanding is that some of the artwork as shipped is licensed
only for compliant OSes (technically, OSes that also have a
trademark license), this is similar to
how others protect their logos etc... it's the "identity" that's
associated with the trademark/etc.
Is that conveyed in the license for the rpm package?
my understanding is that the license field in the (binary) RPMs contains
"restricted" for these, with a detailed license inside the package.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
