Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 18:51:45, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: > On 10/5/2010 8:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Released in final versions at feature freeze? Would a beta or RC suffice > > for feature freeze of core components? > > I don't think it's realistic to already plan to be late... if a > realistic schedule slips a week or two, well sh** happens. > But if at the plan level it doesn't line up, that's not going to work.
So we're not going to update to X.org 1.10? This will seriously impact any plans to provide proper touch support. If we're not upgrading to X.org 1.10 in MeeGo 1.2, we'll get out of "headless chicken" mode for now and plan proper touch support for MeeGo 1.3. Taking the cue from: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12373.html > What are the options to pull in the QtMobility 1.2 schedule ? Min will probably say what the options are. But I've already got a couple of desperate emails in my inbox on this subject. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 Qt Developer Days 2010 - Munich Oct 11-13 - San Francisco Nov 1-3 For more information and to register: http://qt.nokia.com/qtdevdays2010
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
