On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:21:04 +0200 Antti Kaijanmäki <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 11:57 -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > Antti Kaijanmäki wrote: >> ... > > last someone talked about kernels, there was a plan to list > > manadatory parts of the kernel config in the next spec (1.2), > > although not in this one. > > > > is that good enough? > > I think IPv6 is mandatory for any product that comes out these days. > Even more importantly now that the IPv4 address pool has finally been > completely depleted. So yes I think MeeGo 1.1 compliance spec should > mention at least even vaguely that IPv6 is required if you don't want > to specify any mandatory kernel configuration at this time. > > On the other hand if you think nobody is going to release MeeGo 1.1 > product then this can wait to 1.2 ;) Kernels have supported IPv6 for years, unless they are specifically configured not to. It would be nice if key core applications would also support it. :Like ConnMan for example. Currently the ConnMan applet blissfully ignores IPv6 even if you are connected: https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10878 Bernd -- Bernd Stramm [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
