Em terça-feira, 8 de fevereiro de 2011, às 07:21:55, Wichmann, Mats D escreveu: > [email protected] wrote: > > Freedesktop.org has some specifications that are relevant to > > developers: > > > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications > > > > Does being MeeGo include a promise to follow some of these > > specifications, or is it left entirely up to the vendor to implement > > whatever they deem fit? > > > > My primary interest at this point is the autostart spec: > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/autostart-spec > > I've been assuming that the ones mentioned in LSB can be > considered a given (Base Directory, Desktop Entry, Desktop > Menu, Icon Theme) although it's possible nothing says so > explicitly. The rest... it sure seems like Autostart > is being followed, should this and others be added to the > compliance spec?
Then we should list the ones that implementations are required to obey, even
if "by reference" and included anyway by the requirement of the packages.
For example, the Icon Naming Convention, which I'm not sure we're following,
we should be.
By the way, has XDG fixed the problem of discovering the active icon theme?
Which in turn reminds me: some of the X-based specs will require a replacement
once we move to Wayland, like XSETTINGS or XDND, whereas others won't make
sense, like NETWM.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
