On 11/28/2010 8:47 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:
2010/11/28 Michael Leibowitz<[email protected]>:
On 11/28/2010 06:59 AM, Zhu, Peter J wrote:
It’s not used by any verticals or included in any pkg groups.
How are these decisions made? OpenCV is a computer vision library that
enables developers to create applications that use image recognition. This
is an area of active interest by several developers and is one of the areas
where developers on competing platforms are making interesting use of
computer vision to make compelling applications. By removing libraries and
utilities, we simply make it harder for developers to get started making
something compelling and interesting with MeeGo.
Shouldn't our goal to be to enable the vast amount of software out there for
Linux/Unix that enables application development, rather than removing
anything that isn't directly used? Aren't we making a distro for mobile
application developers?
Disclaimer: I actually like OpenCV, used it for my master's thesis..
I think the question is also a bit, where's the FEA# for this, who's
the maintainer and who QA's the APIs provided by OpenCV?
actually
you need a FEA to add or remove a package.
to maintain status quo.. not so much.
your case of "program did not get added due to no FEA" is clearly such a
case of adding.. not keeping status quo.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
