On 11/28/2010 12:13 PM, Alexander Kanevskiy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Arjan van de Ven<[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/28/2010 8:14 AM, Alexander Kanevskiy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Arjan van de Ven<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 11/28/2010 6:59 AM, Zhu, Peter J wrote:
It’s not used by any verticals or included in any pkg groups.
Please let us know if there are objections...
which bug is there in the package that warrants removing it?
(I understand that fixing unused packages might be too much work for
their
worth...
but if there's no bugs ........
)
A bit different question: where is MeeGo Architecture Forum decision
about removing some packages ?
there is no decision to delete packages like this, and I'm pretty sure there
won't be one;
I for sure will be against it... esp for packages that have no serious
maintenance burden.
Well, it's not question of who for or against removal.
My point was that all packages that we have in MeeGo should have clear
owner/maintainer and clear understanding and description where this
package fits to architecture of MeeGo. So any addition or removal of
packages should go trough process of FEA# and reviewal of Business
people and Architects Forum to give a decision either this package
present or not present in MeeGo. It shouldn't be anarchy of adding or
removing packages.
agreed.
I would also like to point out that I consider this a point for adding a
package to an image,
more than having a package in OBS at all.
For the later we should be *much* more liberal in having packages than
we should be for the former!
Peter: why did you decide to remove this package from OBS ?
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
