On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/28/2010 8:14 AM, Alexander Kanevskiy wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Arjan van de Ven<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/28/2010 6:59 AM, Zhu, Peter J wrote: >>>> >>>> It’s not used by any verticals or included in any pkg groups. >>>> >>>> Please let us know if there are objections... >>>> >>> which bug is there in the package that warrants removing it? >>> (I understand that fixing unused packages might be too much work for >>> their >>> worth... >>> but if there's no bugs ........ >>> ) >> >> A bit different question: where is MeeGo Architecture Forum decision >> about removing some packages ? > > there is no decision to delete packages like this, and I'm pretty sure there > won't be one; > I for sure will be against it... esp for packages that have no serious > maintenance burden. Well, it's not question of who for or against removal.
My point was that all packages that we have in MeeGo should have clear owner/maintainer and clear understanding and description where this package fits to architecture of MeeGo. So any addition or removal of packages should go trough process of FEA# and reviewal of Business people and Architects Forum to give a decision either this package present or not present in MeeGo. It shouldn't be anarchy of adding or removing packages. -- br, Alexander Kanevskiy _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
