Hear, hear. A mailing list of IT professionals should be able to cope with
checking where their replies are going on a mailing list.

Yes, mistakes sometimes happen - but breaking the implicit default behavior
of facilitating collaboration for the sake of a couple of edge cases feels
a bit silly.

I would attach $0.02 if the bank still issued them.

Cheers

Chris
On 26 May 2015 1:34 pm, "Anthony Briggs" <[email protected]> wrote:

> My 2c: It's a mailing list; it's a public space.
>
> In that context, public replies make perfect sense, and as the most common
> (90+%?) case, should be the easiest option. Replying to someone privately
> is more like pulling them aside at a party - it shouldn't be default.
>
> (Having to do slightly more work to gossip about other people on the list
> seems ok to me too...)
>
> Anthony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> melbourne-pug mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
>
>
_______________________________________________
melbourne-pug mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug

Reply via email to