I have to agree. There's always going to be mistakes made. If the intention is to send a private reply it is the responsibility of the individual to check correct addressing.
> On 26 May 2015, at 2:56 pm, Chris Maclachlan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hear, hear. A mailing list of IT professionals should be able to cope with > checking where their replies are going on a mailing list. > > Yes, mistakes sometimes happen - but breaking the implicit default behavior > of facilitating collaboration for the sake of a couple of edge cases feels a > bit silly. > > I would attach $0.02 if the bank still issued them. > > Cheers > > Chris > >> On 26 May 2015 1:34 pm, "Anthony Briggs" <[email protected]> wrote: >> My 2c: It's a mailing list; it's a public space. >> >> In that context, public replies make perfect sense, and as the most common >> (90+%?) case, should be the easiest option. Replying to someone privately is >> more like pulling them aside at a party - it shouldn't be default. >> >> (Having to do slightly more work to gossip about other people on the list >> seems ok to me too...) >> >> Anthony >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> melbourne-pug mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
