Not only hopping off the rollers but should the motor decide to throw a leg
out bed, they are not held responsible. In saying that you guys appear to
run your cars at fairly safe standard levels so the chances of doing any
serious damage are avoided.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zac Campbell
Sent: Friday, 8 September 2000 14:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 1600 High speed stability
My car has been on a dyno twice each time I haven't had to sign such form.
Then again there isn't much chance of it hopping off the rollers :)
zac
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: 1600 High speed stability
> It is rare these days not to sign an indemnity clause relieving the Dyno
> Operator of any and all responsibility.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zac Campbell
> Sent: Friday, 8 September 2000 9:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 1600 High speed stability
>
>
> They are meant to tie the cars down (for safety) but they never do! Thus
> dyno
> tester's fault, in my opinion (and my lawyers:))
>
> zac
>
> > That has actually happened in the middle of a dyno test? Who pays for
the
>
> >damage? Car owner or DYNO tester who obviously bungled his job.
> >
> >Adam
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Terry & Heather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 2:42 AM
> >Subject: RE: 1600 High speed stability
> >
> >
> >> Don't laugh, I've seen the results from a car that jumped out of a dyno
> >> pulling megga revs at the time, Canberra ppl will remember Davo's - not
a
>
> >> pretty sight, good thing was no one got killed.
> >>
> >> Terry
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Jackson
> >> Sent: Thursday, 7 September 2000 2:50 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: 1600 High speed stability
> >>
> >>
> >> lol
> >>
> >> and when the bricks fall over and the tyres are spinning at
> >> 250clicks....wonder how many peices that 16 would be in :)
> >>
> >> Adam
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Geordie Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:14 PM
> >> Subject: RE: 1600 High speed stability
> >>
> >>
> >> > Why don't you just brick up the back of the car and run it on the
> >> AIR-DYNO?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Ward
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, 7 September 2000 1:26 PM
> >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > Subject: Re: 1600 High speed stability
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Yep. ;)
> >> > >
> >> > > Wardy
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: "Geordie Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:15 PM
> >> > > Subject: RE: 1600 High speed stability
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > Isn't there a law against things like that?
> >> > > > :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark
> >Ward
> >> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 7 September 2000 12:47 PM
> >> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > > Subject: Re: 1600 High speed stability
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Gave it a go last night but ran out of road. Got to 6,500 in
> >> > > 5th and no
> >> > > > > word of a lie, it wasn't slowing down. If I had another gear
I'd
>
> >> > > > > go for it.
> >> > > > > The speedo was hard off the clock. (Running 10psi) Tyres
> >> > > 195/60/r14's.
> >> > > > > I'll give another go soon. I have no idea what speed I was
> >doing
> >> !
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Wardy
> >> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > > From: "Terry & Heather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:06 AM
> >> > > > > Subject: RE: 1600 High speed stability
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Jake,
> >> > > > > > That's what I would have expected from a good FJ/510,
> >> > > something close
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > speed the DR30 RS-X is capable of in race trim as they
> >> > > would have been
> >> > > > > > around 1000kg, I think the Gibson cars were doing ~260 kph
down
>
> >> > > conrod.
> >> > > > > > Damn, you're quicker in 4th (just) 7500 = 132mph or 212 kph
> >> > > > > than mine was
> >> > > > > in
> >> > > > > > 5th with 4.375 rear gears; Your 5th @ 7500 = 155 mph or 250
kph
>
> >> > > > > and that's
> >> > > > > > the best yet. I wonder what Wardy can pull when he gets it
all
>
> >> > > > > sorted out
> >> > > > > > with 3.55 rear gears.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > terry
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Turbo
>
> >> 510
> >> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2000 12:54 PM
> >> > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > > > Subject: RE: 1600 High speed stability
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I've had my FJ20T 1600 wound out to 7500rpm in 5th with 3.7:1
> >diff
> >> > > gears
> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > > 195/50/15's. Sits solid as a rock and it's only 1" lowered
with
>
> >an
> >> > > > > > adjustable front end and good shocks/springs. Speedo's jammed
> >> > > > > against the
> >> > > > > > wrong side of the 0 stop but I'd estimate close to 240kmh.
> >> > > > > > My bro wound his SR20DET 1600 out to 7200rpm in 4th with
3.5:1
>
> >> > > > > diff gears
> >> > > > > > and 225/40/16's. Speedo needle pointing straight down so
> >> > > I'd estimate
> >> > > > > around
> >> > > > > > 200kmh. His car sit's 2.5" down at the front, 1.5" at the
rear,
>
> >> > > > > again with
> >> > > > > > good quality springs/shocks and he also runs a rear sway bar.
> >> > > > > > Jake
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >Any car without a rear spoiler will wiggle it's ass at
> >> > > +140km/h. It's
> >> > > > > also
> >> > > > > > >got something to do with air flow and traction..
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >>
_________________________________________________________________________
>
> >> > > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> >> > > > http://www.hotmail.com.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public
profile
>
> >at
> >> > > > > http://profiles.msn.com.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
