|
Adam,
If I
had the choice with all things being equal and they were both available at
around the same $ I'd buy the 240K struts too, but I certainly wouldn't go
out of my way to replace a set of good 200B struts. The 240K are a fraction
shorter, something like .25" but if you use the 240K insulators you can get ~.5"
more but you have to slot the 1600 towers. Any brake that bolts to one will bolt
to the other and unless you can get the 270mm discs it's not worth the hassle
IMHO off course. Most 240K struts I've seen lately with the big discs are so
worn they were worth buying but you grab the callipers though if they look half
decent.
your
choice?
regards
Terry
--membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
- 200B Vs 240K struts.... Adam Jackson
- Re: 200B Vs 240K struts.... steve
- Re: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Terry Rudd
- Re: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Adam Jackson
- RE: 200B Vs 240K struts.... DET Dan
- RE: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Errol Smith
- RE: 200B Vs 240K struts.... James Cox
- RE: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Terry Rudd
- RE: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Pooley, Trevor
- Re: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Adam Jackson
- Re: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Tony Bryant
- Re: 200B Vs 240K struts.... zac510
- RE: 200B Vs 240K struts.... Pooley, Trevor
