Hello Andrew,

Cool, so its just the leverage effect of having the spring mounted in
between the pivot point and the wheel. I think I remember this on my
Z, but I havent paid a lot of attention to that just yet, at the
moment I am mainly doing mundane things like replacing batteries,
bulbs, broken bits etc etc. If I get my hands on a digital cam some
time I will take some pics, its not much, but its mine :)

Friday, May 03, 2002, 4:16:47 PM, you wrote:

AG> Hey Mark,

AG> I dont know about the intelligent bit but thanks :)

AG> oops sorry if you (and probably everyone else) didnt have a clue 
AG> what I was saying!!

AG> Basically I was trying to explain that:
AG> * the spring to corner ratio relates a spring at its attachment 
AG> location to its effect at/on the wheel (corner)
AG> * is related to how much the spring moves for a given wheel 
AG> deflection
AG> * it can be worked out if someone has a different car, or changed 
AG> their spring attachment point (race car?), and wants to work out the 
AG> effect of their springs

AG> Hope that clears it up?!
AG> Sorry,
AG> Andrew

>> Dam - there are some intelligent people on this list.
>> 
>> Andrew I have no idea what you just tried to explain, but I do understand
>> the basic concept. It's good to know that we have people on this list who
>> can actually "figure out" the engineering aspects of the cars we love - good
>> work mate!
>> 
>> Mark.
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Andrew Greenbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:49 AM
>> Subject: RE: question
>> 
>> 
>> > Hi Bob,
>> >
>> > Because of the strut suspension on the front, the "effective" spring
>> > rate at the wheels (or wheel rate) is roughly the poundage of the
>> > springs. But because the springs are inboard on the rear, their
>> > influence at the wheels is reduced, so stiffer springs are required
>> > on the rear to have the same effective rate at the wheels. Terry
>> > says this spring to corner (wheel) ratio is roughly .26
>> >
>> > I may be wrong but I think he gets this from:
>> > Kw=Ks*(IR)^2
>> > where Kw = effective rate at the wheels (wheel rate)
>> > Ks = spring rate
>> > IR = installation ratio, or motion ratio = y/x where y = the resulting
>> > spring compression from a wheel deflection x
>> >
>> > ie the spring to corner ratio is a measure of the spring position to
>> > the wheels. Terry is saying IR^2 =.26, because for a given
>> > deflection at the wheel, the 1600 rear springs compress roughly
>> > half that amount??
>> >
>> > Im open to corrections, and sorry for the backwards explanation!
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> > > What is the spring to corner ratio a measure of?
>> > >
>> > > > Ben,
>> > > >
>> > > > It depends on the car i.e. IRS etc? On a 1600 most of the good
>> > > handling dirt
>> > > > versions have slightly softer springs in the rear. When you look at
>> > > the
>> > > > poundage rates on a 1600 allow for the spring to corner ratio on the
>> > > rears
>> > > > which as around .26:1 and on the front with stock struts the rate is
>> > > 1:1.
>> > > > i.e. 200# front springs are the same as ~800# rear springs. On a
>> > > 1600 RC a
>> > > > good starting rate is 175# front and 600# rear.
>> > > >
>> > > > regards
>> > > > Terry
>> > > >   -----Original Message-----
>> > > >   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben
>> > > >   Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 12:05 PM
>> > > >   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >   Subject: question
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >   bit of a strange question. my brother has sent me his RC car to
>> > > rebuild
>> > > > for him. im just setting up all the suspension at the moment. just
>> > > > wondering, with a normal car setup, are the rear springs stiffer
>> > > than the
>> > > > front, or is it the other way round??
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > --membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >   OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
>> > > >   Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >   Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >   No unauthorised redistribution of this email
>> > > >   http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
>> > > >   http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
>> > > >   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> > > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > --membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
>> > > > Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > No unauthorised redistribution of this email
>> > > > http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
>> > > > http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
>> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> > > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 





-- 
Best regards,
 Bob                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to