ok guys - heres a real life example for you ! we have an rb20 motor with two
of the original turbos fitted as a twin turbo setup both turbos with the
original intregal wastegates - with no mods to the wastegates it runs aprox
ten pounds boost - std single they run approx 8 pounds boost - so slight
increase but marginal !  by the way on 18 pounds it creates 400 rear wheel
horsepower !
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: please explainnnnnnnnnn.......


> Bob,
>
> Good point, however, in an automotive induction system, the point of
> lowest pressure is actually the point where all the air is exiting the
> system- the inlet runners.  In a system of constant volume, the pressure
> would be double, as the number of molecules would double due to two
> pumps instead of one (ideal gas law: PV=nRT)  However this only applies
> to closed systems, so in this case where there is a pressure drop in the
> system (the throttlebody) the best explanation I can come up with (since
> I don't have a physics degree) is to approximate it somewhere between
> the same pressure and double the pressure!  Things like turbo efficiency
> and dynamics would come into it.. so twin turbos on 10psi each at
> constant rpm would be about 16psi....or something... I think....!
>
> - Tom
>
>
>
> Bob wrote:
>
> >I think you would find that the pressure from the turbos is not going
> >to add together to give twice the boost. If this were the case, in the
> >piping leading from each of the turbos you would see 10psi, and in the
> >plenum you would see 20psi. Liquids/gasses always try to flow from
> >high pressure to low pressure points, so the air would then be trying
> >to flow back from the plenum to the turbos if that were the case.
> >
> >As I understand it there are basically two types of twin turbo setups
> >used on cars, one where you have two smaller turbos of the same size
> >which should spool up identically etc and not have the syncronisation
> >problem, which allows you to use small turbos to get less lag without
> >as much restriction at the top end, and the second type like on late
> >model 13Bs where it has a small turbo to cover the bottom end, and a
> >big turbo for the top end. I read a report once where the engineers
> >were commenting on the setup of it, apparently its a real bitch to get
> >right.
> >
> >Saturday, July 27, 2002, 12:00:19 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >DA> Ummm, correct me if i'm wrong Mark, but the only time one turbo
shitting
> >DA> itself would cause diff intake into those two cylinders would be if
you
> >DA> were running two separate intake manifolds yes? If both turbos go to
the
> >DA> one intercooler, then to a single throttle body, single plenum, and
into
> >DA> all 4 you shouldn't have that problem.
> >
> >DA> Oh and two turbos at 10 psi is 20 psi the engine would see. To get 10
psi
> >DA> out of a twin setup you'd only need each to be at 5 psi. Is this
correct?
> >DA> Regards,
> >
> >DA> Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> >DA> On 7/27/02, 10:42:22 AM, "Paul Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding
> >DA> Re: please explainnnnnnnnnn.......:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>If syncronisation is a problem what about a custom turbo with seperate
> >>>turbines all connected to the one shaft?  Is that possible?  While
you're
> >>>
> >>>
> >DA> at
> >
> >
> >>>it... you could go the whole hog and make it a quad turbo.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>From: Paul Stanley
> >>>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: Rick White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 2:33 AM
> >>>Subject: Re: please explainnnnnnnnnn.......
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>Mark.
> >>>>I could maybee se a problem with having one per two cylinders.
> >>>>if one decides to shit itself one half of the engine would get totally
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>different air fuel ratios and maybee the whole thing going bang big
time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Like half of the engine would like kinda stall and the other half
would
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >DA> be
> >
> >
> >>>fueled and boosted up big time so the half with the dead turbo would
> >>>probably lean out??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I recon one turbo is enough of a worry with out adding another to the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>equasion.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>But two spooling up to ten psi would happen quicker with only half the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>induction  needed so you would be really getting like maybee 18maybee
psi
> >>>
> >>>
> >DA> in
> >
> >
> >>>real terms?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Just my thinking really.
> >>>>maybee I am way off track here. dunno.
> >>>>Later mate.
> >>>>Rick White.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--- "mark krawczuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>hi,   if you have a  single turbo at 10 psi, feeding 4 cyls,  would
it
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>go
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>better/or what would happen if you have two turbos at 10 psi,  with
each
> >>>>>turbo feeding 2 cyls?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>i was fairly ,sorta on the track explaining to my  bro, but then he
said
> >>>>>amongst other stuff, that he cant see any reason why two are better
than
> >>>>>one.....
> >>>>>
> >>>>>mark k
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>_____________________________________________________________
> >>>>Get Your free Ozdat Email Account
> >>>>---> http://www.ozdat.com
> >>>>
> >>>>_____________________________________________________________
> >>>>Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] by Everyone.net  http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to