Orn, I've never had a flu shot either....maybe we are related?



On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:15 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> For the record, (and using purely anecdotal evidence) I have NEVER had
> a flu shot...and I'm an old fart!....and don't get the flu.
>
> On Jan 14, 8:18 am, CrossBow <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Do you ever get sick? No, probably not, you are too ornery to get sick!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Clogtowner <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi y'all - my advice would be to sit back and watch everyone else take
> > > the shots and follow my lead to avoid doctors for the whole of your
> > > existance on this planet.
>  >
> > > On Jan 14, 10:08 am, CrossBow <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hm.  You can look at it this way.  A Doctor's business name is
> usually a
> > > > medical "practice" right? We are continually being practiced on and
> > > > constantly producing statistics for study everytime you walk into an
> > > > office.  Don't know how or if that information is ever used for
> research,
> > > > but I think it would make sense if it were released after stripped of
> > > > person's name, etc.  Why not? Would it be wrong to ask the medical
> > > > profession to pool this kind of knowledge for researchers, or is it
> > > already
> > > > being done?
> >
> > > > Rhiannon is due for her shots and we will go when the time comes.
>  It's
> > > > going to stink cause she is going to freak and never going to want to
> go
> > > > back..she doesnt remember the first round.
> >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jason (Memphis)
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > Something similar to that is how these studies are almost always
> done,
> > > > > that is, correlational studies. The researchers never (almost never
> > > > > anyway) systematically manipulate variables to watch/measure the
> > > > > detrimental effects on the people.  Instead, the researchers watch
> > > > > those events happen naturally in the environment or culture and
> then
> > > > > use the correlations to draw plausible casual relationships.
> >
> > > > > On Jan 14, 9:13 am, Isparklaria <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > I was suggesting a demographic atatisical study. There are years
> > > where
> > > > > > little or no vaccinations were given years where many
> vaccinations
> > > > > > were given. Within those years when many vaccinations were given
> > > there
> > > > > > are individuals who didn't have their children vaccinated and
> > > possible
> > > > > > some who used a modified vaacination schedule (maybe even enough
> of
> > > > > > these to see some correlation). There are also populations in
> other
> > > > > > nations that have a different vaccination schedule than the USA.
> All
> > > > > > in all it is likley that some correlation can be found. Of course
> > > when
> > > > > > you are looking at other nations you are to some degree comparing
> > > > > > apples and oranges. However, at the end of the day it is likley
> that
> > > > > > better suggestions can be made as well as allowing people to make
> up
> > > > > > their own minds, which they are allowed to do now in the USA.
> >
> > > > > > On Jan 14, 8:51 am, "Liz Purkrabek" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > See, that's why you DON'T TELL the parents that it will be
> > > dangerous.
> > > > >  And
> > > > > > > you make sure to choose only stupid and/or ugly children to
> > > > > participate.
> >
> > > > > > > Liz
> >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [email protected]
> >
> > > > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of
> > > > > Jason
> > > > > > > (Memphis)
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:45 AM
> > > > > > > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Has the link to autism and mercury in vaccines
> been
> > > > > debunked?
> >
> > > > > > > good luck with getting parents to volunteer their kids for that
> > > study
> > > > > > > especially a schedule that is likely to handicap their child.
> >
> > > > > > > On Jan 13, 8:40 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > "...At the very least studies need to be done, by an
> independent
> > > > > > > > group, to determine if the vaccination schedule should be
> > > > > > > > modified. ..." Ish
> >
> > > > > > > > Rhetorical question: Who is going to pay for this
> 'independent
> > > > > group's
> > > > > > > > study?
> >
> > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:59 am, Isparklaria <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > What I don't understand is why so many vaccinations have to
> be
> > > > > > > > > administered in such a short time to very young babies. It
> > > seems to
> > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > that some vaccinations might be eliminated and the rest
> spread
> > > out
> > > > > > > > > more. Hey, but what do I know; I don't make make any money
> on
> > > this.
> > > > > > > > > What is relevant is that I am not an immunologist. At the
> very
> > > > > least
> > > > > > > > > studies need to be done, by an independent group, to
> determine
> > > if
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > vaccination schedule should be modified. It might also be
> good
> > > to
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > beyond statistics and try to figure which children, if any,
> > > might
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > harmed by over vaccination. Treating people as statisitics
> is
> > > not
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > way to go, if it is possible to do more. It would be a
> small
> > > > > > > > > consolation to the parents os a damaged child to know that
> they
> > > > > made
> > > > > > > > > the right choice for a hypothetical child but the wrong
> choice
> > > for
> > > > > > > > > their very real flesh and blood child.
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Jan 12, 9:49 pm, ornamentalmind <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > When I found out that the drug companies had lobbied for
> and
> > > > > achieved
> > > > > > > > > > bills to be passed that made it impossible for parents to
> sue
> > > > > them for
> > > > > > > > > > 'side effects' of vaccines, I lost all faith in the
> > > companies.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On Jan 12, 2:12 pm, "Liz Purkrabek" <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember ever craving hot foods, but my dad's
> mom
> > > > > craved
> > > > > > > > > > > Alka-Seltzer during one of her pregnancies.  They had
> to
> > > watch
> > > > > her
> > > > > > > all the
> > > > > > > > > > > time or she would sneak the stuff.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > liz
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected]
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> > > Behalf
> > > > > Of
> > > > > > > Jason
> > > > > > > > > > > (Memphis)
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:36 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Has the link to autism and mercury in
> vaccines
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > debunked?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > eat lots of really hot peppers while you are pregnant.
>  you
> > > may
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > sick (increased chances of morning sickness) and
> possibly
> > > > > damage the
> > > > > > > > > > > fetus.  those plant toxins and plant irritants aren't
> > > actually
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > good for you or the fetus...neither is lead, mercury,
> high
> > > > > levels of
> > > > > > > > > > > radiation, etc.  there may be a reason why most women
> > > naturally
> > > > > > > avoid
> > > > > > > > > > > hot spicy food while pregnant.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 12, 2:11 pm, CrossBow <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > those harmless looking little peppers....
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > weird though..most chicks I know don't go for the
> spicy
> > > > > because
> > > > > > > most of us
> > > > > > > > > > > > are slightly queasy or just plain sick when we are
> > > preggers
> > > > > at one
> > > > > > > point
> > > > > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > > other and spicy isnt on the plate...I mean you don't
> see
> > > many
> > > > > > > gobbling
> > > > > > > > > > > > habaneros:)
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Jason (Memphis)
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Angle?  That is an interesting way of looking at
> it.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 12, 1:40 pm, CrossBow <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks...never thought of the spicy foods angle.
> > >  Will
> > > > > mention
> > > > > > > it to
> > > > > > > > > > > her.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason (Memphis)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody knows what causes autism.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My advice:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.   She stay away from mercury, lead, high
> levels
> > > of
> > > > > > > radiation and
> > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > many psychotropic medications (natural or
> > > unnatural)
> > > > > while
> > > > > > > she is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pregnant and the child's brain is forming.
> Flushing
> > > a
> > > > > > > forming
> > > > > > > > > > > fetus's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brain with synthetic neurological chemicals
> and/or
> > > > > > > unnaturally high
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > levels of natural neurological agents is
> probably
> > > not a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > > idea.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I do not want to completely discourage
> it
> > > > > because I
> > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > paid
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good money to work with women who've destroyed
> or
> > > > > deformed
> > > > > > > fetus'
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brains by consumption or injection of
> neurological
> > > > > agents
> > > > > > > while
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pregnant.  Right now, though, my field is
> swamped.
> > > So
> > > > > she
> > > > > > > might want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to try NOT to destroy or deform her kid's brain
> > > while
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > womb.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  2.  She also may want to avoid plant toxins
> (hot
> > > spicy
> > > > > > > foods or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plants such as hot peppers) that plants have
> > > evolved
> > > > > (albeit
> > > > > > > > > > > sometimes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsuccessfully) because it deters their
> consumption
> > > by
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > animals.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3.  Get advice from her pediatrician and/or
> > > physician
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > websites
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are affiliated with
> >
>  > ...
> >
> > read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>


-- 
gnothe se auton

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to