> Are you aware that Rails 3.0 supersedes Merb. > If you want less options go with Rails.
You are convinced about that? So in your opinion Rails has less fatures than merb? That's incredible... > If you want tiny go with Sinatra or merb-gen very-flat Where I say that? I say only: more concise, more stable, more tiny. > Pick the tool for the job - Merb works great as is. > Has a lot of functionality and flexibility. > Merb can be molded and manipulated to do what you want to do. Tell me, how many webapps do you build with them can you show me some links? > I refuse to use Merb via gem install merb as you get a crap load of gems (as > you have pointed out) and so use the bundler :) Do you use some thing in a production env? I don't mean ONE "site" on a vps, but think people like me that for each server host some like 150+ sites... I can bundle gems in a vendor dir? So in future if there is a "security problem in merb" I need to edit 150+ projects and then git push it on the server... we are crazy? I want (if possible) that all of us can take a GLOBAL view, don't see only your reality but think to: - Newbie people - Big society - You Then, about the dead of merb, I talked with some member of the current team of merb and I don't think It will die. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
